In this post, Art Wynberg and Daniel Robert Erasmus unpack the Democratic Alliance v Hlophe case, where the Court interdicted Dr. Hlophe, an MP for the uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) Party, from participating in the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) processes. They critique the Court's classification of the National Assembly's designation of Dr. Hlophe to the JSC as Administrative Action (AA) under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA). The post examines the broader implications of this ruling, suggesting it could set a precedent for increased judicial review of parliamentary decisions.

The recent appointment of Raymond Zondo as the new Chief Justice of South Africa’s Constitutional Court generated much debate centred on his qualifications, experience and suitability. Against this background, it is opportune to review the selection procedure of superior court judges, particularly in the African context.