Ahead of her upcoming publication in CCR XIV, Dr Rishika Sahgal analyses and critiques two cases decided by the apex courts in India and South Africa in 2022, Janhit Abhiyan and Social Justice Coalition. These cases reveal that even when poverty is recognised as a ground within equality law, several tensions or barriers to achieving substantive equality for the impoverished may arise.

In this blog post, Wandile Brian Zondo argues that the Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Bill 2024 is constitutionally problematic and continues to threaten informal land rights and rural democracy in South Africa.

Ahead of the 10th session of negotiations of the Intergovernmental Working Group on a legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises, David Bilchitz argues that a scope clause is unnecessary and likely to exacerbate divisions.

In this article, Nico Steytler discusses the implications of South Africa's 2024 elections, which saw the ANC lose its parliamentary majority for the first time in 30 years and the formation of a Government of National Unity (GNU). Steytler examines whether this shift will strengthen democracy and federalism or deepen existing divisions, as the nation grapples with entrenched inequality and the challenges of collaborative governance.

In this article, Joshua Kyeremateng and Theophilus Edwin Coleman offer five reasons why the circuit court in Ghana should have arrived at a different conclusion on the employment status of gig workers in Justice Noah Adade v. Bolt Ghana Limited and Another.

Lee-Anne Germanos Manuel discusses the significance of The Embrace Project v Minister of Justice and Correctional Service, in which the applicants successfully challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions relating to consent-based sexual offences in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007 in the High Court of South Africa. The constitutional challenge focused on the element of criminal intent and its effect on consent and now awaits confirmation by the Constitutional Court.

In this post, Art Wynberg and Daniel Robert Erasmus unpack the Democratic Alliance v Hlophe case, where the Court interdicted Dr. Hlophe, an MP for the uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) Party, from participating in the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) processes. They critique the Court's classification of the National Assembly's designation of Dr. Hlophe to the JSC as Administrative Action (AA) under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA). The post examines the broader implications of this ruling, suggesting it could set a precedent for increased judicial review of parliamentary decisions.

In this post, Rebecca Gore highlights the systemic barriers faced by female inmates in accessing menstrual health management. Drawing on South Africa's prison system, the author discusses how female inmates experience a shortage of sanitary pads, lack of access to tampons, water, private spaces, and limited education on menstruation. Her examination of existing legal and policy frameworks reveals the gap between international standards and the lived realities of incarcerated women in South Africa.

In this post, Marthinus van Staden discusses the intersection of land dispossession and labor control in South Africa’s colonial and apartheid history, as highlighted by the recent case of Izaacs v Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others. This landmark ruling, delivered by the Land Claims Court in October 2023, sheds light on the enduring legacy of racially motivated land theft and its profound impact on indigenous South Africans.

In this post, Mayen Mangok Ruop advocates for the urgent reform of South Sudan’s criminal defamation laws, which are frequently used to suppress journalists and hinder press freedom. Drawing on the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights’ landmark decision in Konaté v. Burkina Faso, Ruop argues that defamation should be decriminalized and replaced with civil remedies that strike a balance between protecting individual reputations and upholding a free and independent press.

In this third installment of our series on democracy, exclusion, and participation, Sophie Smit discusses the judiciary's role in protecting non-citizens' right to administrative action in South Africa, focusing on the termination of the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP) by the Department of Home Affairs. She notes that since non-citizens, including ZEP holders, lack the right to vote and thus political representation, they rely on the judiciary to protect their rights. Consequently, the Pretoria High Court found the termination unconstitutional due to a lack of fair process. She emphasizes the importance of the judiciary's duty to uphold constitutional rights for non-citizens while respecting executive decision-making.

In the second installment of our series on democracy, exclusion, and participation, Professor Marthinus discusses the uncertain position of migrant workers in South Africa, who contribute to the economy but are excluded from voting due to their non-citizen status. It explores alternative forms of engagement, like collective action, to protect their rights. Drawing on theoretical and legal frameworks, the article emphasizes the importance of balancing labor law enforcement with immigration enforcement to reduce fears of deportation in undocumented workers when trying to assert their rights. Also, the author observes that ensuring migrant workers can participate in collective actions, such as trade unionism, is crucial for safeguarding their rights and promoting a more inclusive democratic society.

In the the first of a two-part series, Ugochukwu Ezeh discusses judicial transparency, corruption and the integrity of democratic institutions against the backdrop of the contested presidential election in Nigeria.

In this last post as part of the ‘Maputo at 20’ series, we speak with Hon. Commissioner Ramatoulie Janet Sallah-Njie, the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa, about the future of the Maputo Protocol, it’s potential for advancing women's rights in Africa, and the challenges that need to be addressed for its full realisation.

In spite of the Maputo Protocol's clear prohibition of Violence Against Women (VAW), the ongoing prevalence of violence in Africa has spurred calls for a regional treaty aimed at eradicating such violence. Against this backdrop, Adetokunbo Johnson reflects on the innovation of the Maputo Protocol's explicit VAW prohibition and questions the need for an additional instrument.