In this week’s post, Nurina Ally and others offer an overview of the Constitutional Court’s operations, shedding light on aspects of the Court's work that rarely receive attention. Their analysis captures the bigger picture and highlights some of the unique challenges the Court encounters.

Lee-Anne Germanos Manuel discusses the significance of The Embrace Project v Minister of Justice and Correctional Service, in which the applicants successfully challenged the constitutionality of certain provisions relating to consent-based sexual offences in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007 in the High Court of South Africa. The constitutional challenge focused on the element of criminal intent and its effect on consent and now awaits confirmation by the Constitutional Court.

In this article, Lauren Loxton offers a critical analysis of the Judicial Service Commission of South Africa's approach to interviewing and selecting candidates for Constitutional Court appointments, highlighting the risks posed by the absence of adequate judicial expertise needed to handle appeals in intricate and specialized areas of law.

This week's blog post highlights a book feature. We had a conversation with Associate Professors Roxan Laubscher and Martinus van Staden about their recent publication, which explores landmark legal cases in South Africa's constitutional history. The book delves into these cases' effects on the nation's legal and social landscape, offering an in-depth analysis of key court decisions and their broader implications for justice and governance in South Africa.

In this post, Wandile Brian Zondo and Nomfundo Ramalekana discuss a recent judgment by the High Court of Namibia declaring the common law crimes of sodomy and unnatural sexual offences unconstitutional, and sequentially invalid. The authors examine how the High Court interpreted the Constitution of Namibia to reach this conclusion and posit that this decision marks a momentous step towards the full realization of LGBTQI+ rights in Namibia and serves as a beacon of hope for the region.

In this post, Ozioma Nwadike Esq. reflects on the state of the Nigerian electoral system in light of the anti-reform judicial stance exhibited by the Supreme Court. With reference to some of the Court's recent judgments, Nwadike argues that the progressive steps taken by the legislature to reform the system have been undermined by the Court through its reliance on arcane legal formalism. The implication is that little progress has been made in electoral system reforms since 2007.

In this post, Lauren Loxton provides an analysis of the Constitutional Court's recent judgment in Electoral Commission of South Africa v Umkhonto Wesizwe Political Party (EC v MK). She highlights that while this case reveals the importance of judicial decisiveness in electoral matters, it also sheds light on the strain that persistent legal battles from serial litigants such as Jacob Zuma can place on the judicial system.

This blog post sheds light on President Sall's controversial decision to indefinitely postpone Senegal's presidential elections. Initially slated for February 25, 2024, the elections have been enveloped in uncertainty and concern following this unexpected move.

This article examines citizenship complexities in South Africa, centering on individuals born to foreign parents. It offers a critical analysis of s 4(3) of the Citizenship Act, asserting that the current provision, requiring individuals to wait until 18 for citizenship, is deserving of scrutiny. The author proposes a re-evaluation of this legal framework to foster greater inclusivity and equity. It

In this week’s post, the author examines the Constitutional Court’s decision in Thubakgale v Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and highlights five analytical reasoning defects in the judgment.

With the upcoming 2024 South African elections on the horizon, this week's post delves into the critical role of elections in holding the executive accountable. Shadi Maganoe examines the stance of South African courts regarding the challenges that emerged within the electoral system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Earlier this year, Ghana's Supreme Court declared the Imposition of Restrictions Act (IRA) 2020 unconstitutional, merely three years after its enactment. This post takes a closer look at the IRA's prior controversies and highlights the key aspects of the Court's decision that substantiated earlier concerns, ultimately leading to the Act’s repeal.

Last month, the Kenyan Court of Appeal ruled that life imprisonment sentence violates fundamental constitutional rights. Joshua Nyawa explores the Court's reasoning and the decision’s far-reaching implications for Kenyan jurisprudence.

In a recent judgment, the High Court of Kenya ruled that the President had exceeded his authority by not following the required procedures when he appointed 50 Chief Administrative Secretaries (CAS). Joshua Nyawa delves into the implications of this ruling and argues for a shift from symbolic constitutionalism to real constitutionalism in Kenya.

In “Constitutionalism and the Economy in Africa”, the relationship between constitutionalism and economic growth in Africa is examined with reference to how constitutional reforms in the 1990s and beyond have reflected the shift towards a market economy. Through these inquiries, the book aims to deepen our understanding of how constitutional frameworks interact with economic growth in Africa. ALM caught up with editors, Prof Charles Fombad and Prof Nico Steytler to ask them more about this book.