Our Blog
Categories
- Africa
- African Union
- Central Africa
- Citizenship laws
- Competion Law
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutional Law
- Disability rights
- East Africa
- Environmental Law
- Human Rights
- Immigration Laws
- International Law
- Kenya
- Mining Law
- Nigeria
- North Africa
- Political Rights
- Public Law
- Right to Vote
- SADC Region
- South Africa
- Southern Africa
- Uganda
- West Africa
Nurturing inclusivity: reforming citizenship laws for children born to foreign parents in South Africa
This article examines citizenship complexities in South Africa, centering on individuals born to foreign parents. It offers a critical analysis of s 4(3) of the Citizenship Act, asserting that the current provision, requiring individuals to wait until 18 for citizenship, is deserving of scrutiny. The author proposes a re-evaluation of this legal framework to foster greater inclusivity and equity. It
The Analytical Reasoning Defects in Thubakgale v Ekhuruleni Metropolitan Municipality
In this week’s post, the author examines the Constitutional Court’s decision in Thubakgale v Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and highlights five analytical reasoning defects in the judgment.
The Termination of the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit: A Direct Violation of the Principle of Non-refoulment?
Last year, the South African Minister of Home Affairs, Dr. Aaron Motswaledi announced the termination of the Zimbabwean Special Permits (ZEPs) set to expire at the end of 2021. Thato Gaffane argues that this decision is a violation of the international principle of non-refoulment and also, fatally flawed in as far as it lacks consideration for section 33 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.
Rafoneke v Minister of Justice: What about Intersectionality?
In Rafoneke v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (Rafoneke), the SA Constitutional Court had to consider whether section 24 (2)(b) read with section 115 of the Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014 (LPA) unfairly discriminated against foreign nationals on the basis of citizenship and social origin. Geoffrey Allsop and Ohene Yaw Ampofo-Anti argue that the court did not apply the principle of intersectionality correctly in its finding that these provisions are constitutional.
Bwanya v Master of the High Court: Right for the Wrong Reasons
Bwanya v Master of the High Court was the first occasion on which the Constitutional Court expressly refused to follow one of its previous decisions. Joshua Davis considers the basis on which it did so and the implications for the doctrine of precedent, and argues that the judgment was ultimately right for the wrong reasons.
Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business
In “Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business”, David Bilchitz considers how to improve the global framework surrounding corporate obligations to ensure greater guidance on the content of these obligations as well as better decision-making both within corporations and national institutions. ALM caught up with Prof Bilchitz to ask him more about his new book.
- BBI judgment
- Children's rights
- Climate Change
- Constitutional Law
- Constitutional reform
- Covid-19
- Democracy
- Election series
- Elections
- Environmental Justice
- Equality
- Human Rights
- International Law
- Judicial independence
- Kenya
- LGBTQ+ Rights
- Migration
- Namibia
- Nigeria
- Political Rights
- Public participation
- Refugee and migration series
- Refugees
- South Africa
- South African Constitution
- Voting Rights
- Women in Africa
- Women's Month
- Women's rights
- World Congress
Submissions
We welcome unsolicited submissions covering current legal developments in constitutional law, fundamental rights law, public law, international law and related fields.