Our Blog

Human Rights, Public Law, Constitutional Law Rishika Sahgal Human Rights, Public Law, Constitutional Law Rishika Sahgal

Poverty as a Ground in South Africa and India

Ahead of her upcoming publication in CCR XIV, Dr Rishika Sahgal analyses and critiques two cases decided by the apex courts in India and South Africa in 2022, Janhit Abhiyan and Social Justice Coalition. These cases reveal that even when poverty is recognised as a ground within equality law, several tensions or barriers to achieving substantive equality for the impoverished may arise.

Read More
Southern Africa, Constitutional Law Wandile Brian Zondo and Nomfundo Ramalekana Southern Africa, Constitutional Law Wandile Brian Zondo and Nomfundo Ramalekana

Namibian High Court Decriminalises the ‘Crime of Sodomy’ and ‘Unnatural Sexual Offences’: A Beacon of Hope for LGBTQIA+ Rights in Africa?

In this post, Wandile Brian Zondo and Nomfundo Ramalekana discuss a recent judgment by the High Court of Namibia declaring the common law crimes of sodomy and unnatural sexual offences unconstitutional, and sequentially invalid. The authors examine how the High Court interpreted the Constitution of Namibia to reach this conclusion and posit that this decision marks a momentous step towards the full realization of LGBTQI+ rights in Namibia and serves as a beacon of hope for the region.

Read More
Human Rights, International Law Olivier De Schutter Human Rights, International Law Olivier De Schutter

Povertyism is a Major Obstacle to the Eradication of Poverty. It’s Time to Ban it.

United Nations Special Rapporteur, Olivier De Schutter calls for an end to ‘povertyism’ - the discrimination & negative attitudes that bar people in poverty from fully accessing their rights and for states to include socio-economic status as a suspect ground in national anti-discrimination frameworks.

Read More
Human Rights, Constitutional Law Joshua Davis Human Rights, Constitutional Law Joshua Davis

Bwanya v Master of the High Court: Right for the Wrong Reasons

Bwanya v Master of the High Court was the first occasion on which the Constitutional Court expressly refused to follow one of its previous decisions. Joshua Davis considers the basis on which it did so and the implications for the doctrine of precedent, and argues that the judgment was ultimately right for the wrong reasons.

Read More

Submissions

 We welcome unsolicited submissions covering current legal developments in constitutional law, fundamental rights law, public law, international law and related fields.